Thanks for reviewing.
The next revision will have those two nits fixed.


-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Melnikov <>
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM
To: The IESG <>
Cc: "" 
<>, Stephane Litkowski 
<>, "" <>, 
"" <>, 
"" <>
Subject: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <>
Resent-To: <>, <>, 
<>, <>, <>, 
Resent-Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM

    Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: No Objection
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    Please refer to
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    1.2.2. Traffic Black-Holing on Individual AC Failures
       As discussed in section 2.1 the Default DF Election algorithm defined
       by [RFC7432] takes into account only two variables in the modulus
       function for a given ES: the existence of the PE's IP address on the
       candidate list and the locally provisioned Ethernet Tags.
    This document doesn't have section 2.1.
    1.3. The Need for Extending the Default DF Election in EVPN
       Section 2.2 describes some of the issues that exist in the Default DF
       Election procedures. In order to address those issues, this document
    This document doesn't have section 2.2 either.

BESS mailing list

Reply via email to