On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Hu, Jun (Nokia - US/Mountain View) wrote:

I'll be at IETF105, so as long as there is no conflict I can attend a
meeting, whether WG or side meeting. I'll have to read up on some of
these documents though to ensure I understand the items for discussion.

Paul

From: Idr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [Idr] Issue 1: IPSEC related drafts

 

Greetings:

 

At IETF 104, we consider BGP VPNs supporting asking for TLVS in 
draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps.    After hearing all the discussion, the BESS, 
IDR and
I2RS WG chairs discussed what to do with the following

 

Drafts considered:

 *  draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-01.txt,
 *  draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec-00.txt,
 *  draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi-01.txt

relating drafts/ Supporting drafts:

 *  draft-carrell-ipsecme-controller-ike-00.txt
 *  draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-04.txt
 *  draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-12.txt

Basic topologies:

                       Ipsec tunnels  

     [rtrA] -------------------- [rtrB]

         |     \                           /      | 

         |       \ -- RR1 -------/     | ipsec tunnels

         |    / -----| |------\         |

     [rtrC]------------------- [rtrD]

 

 

The decision is that

 *  TLVs mechanisms for new TLVS related draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps should be 
moved to drafts with just the mechanisms. 
     +  All three mechanisms could be included in the TLVs or portions.
     +  The use case and the SA mechanisms can stay in BESS or IDR (depending 
on what is appropriate).
 *  The RTG Chairs are not experts on Security associations, so that we will 
try to schedule a unique session at IETF 105 where security experts can
    help the RTG chairs (BESS, IDR) review the Security association mechanisms. 
     +  We’d love to have the second co-chair of I2NSF (Yoav NIR) and someone 
from IPSECME.
     +  We’ll invite IPSEC experts.
     +  We encourage the authors of the 3 drafts to attend this session in IETF 
105 and present their security-association mechanisms.
 *  The NLRI/SAFI in draft-dunbar-idr-sdwan-port-safi is unique and can be 
requested as IDR or ISE draft.

This email has two request:

 *  WG or authors please send any questions to Susan Hares,
 *  The IDR WG is encouraged to discuss requirements or needs in preparation 
for the TLV selection, and
 *  Please help me secure 2 IPSEC experts to attend this session.

 

Susan Hares

 




_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to