Hi Matthew, We submitted version 07, which addresses your comments. Thank you very much for reviewing.
Jorge -----Original Message----- From: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, July 1, 2019 at 2:20 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Documents shepherd's review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-06 Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Monday, July 1, 2019 at 2:20 PM Authors I am the document shepherd for this draft. Please see below for my comments. Please treat these as you would any other WG last call comments. Please address these before I submit the document to the IESG for publication. Best regards Matthew General: The draft is well written and generally good to go. I have just a few minor comments. Number of Co-Authors: There are 8 co-authors listed in the document header. Generally, the RFC editor expects this to be limited to 5. Please can you reduce the number, e.g. by moving the less active authors to a major contributors section in the draft. RFC2119 language: There are a couple of cases where you may have intended to capitalise certain keywords. For example, in section 4.4 you write 'recommended' when perhaps 'RECOMMENDED' was intended, and 'not recommended' where 'NOT RECOMMENDED' might be more appropriate. Please go thorough and double-check. Thanks Matthew _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
