Thanks!
That may explain why we have what we have. A From: Alvaro Retana <[email protected]> Sent: 10 July 2020 21:06 To: [email protected]; The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) rfc5575bis, when it came out of the WG had a section about error handling including treat-as-withdraw. As we processed and cleaned the document up we ended up not defining specific effort handling for FS, but relying on the behavior for Extended communities already specified somewhere else. Just some digging help. :-) Alvaro. On July 10, 2020 at 3:56:44 PM, Adrian Farrel ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ) wrote: Thanks. I can accept either of your suggestions. I'm going to do some archaeology to remind myself where the treat-as-withdraw came from. I have some memory that it was IDR that pushed us to have this (and other) error actions, but I may well be misremembering. Depending on what I discover, I will pick one or the other of the suggestions and re-post.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
