Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support the DISCUSS ballot position of Erik Kline I support the DISCUSS ballot position of Alvaro Retana I support the DISCUSS ballot position of Ben Kaduk Not much to add to the feedback of my peer ADs. ** Please respond to the SECDIR feedback (and thank you Chris Lonvick for doing it!) ** Section 11. As there is nothing documented to prevent this approach from being used across administrative domains with different policies (i.e., there is no applicability statement or normative language providing caution from being used outside of the commonly reference data center use case) or any security assumptions made about the elements involved, please reiterate that there are no inherent security services being provided to protect the traffic. If this is desired it should provide through other means. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
