Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [DISCUSS cleared] Thanks for this document. It was easy to read even for people like me who don't get involved in routing too much. Thank you also for the shepherd writeup, which (unlike most lately) actually answered the question "Why is this the proper type of RFC?" I also concur with Warren's suggestion. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
