Hi, Ketan: I prefer to “BGP based SRv6 Overlay Service”. This document defines the SRv6 service SID and its control procedures. Anyway, I know the contents, just want it more understandable.
Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Dec 9, 2020, at 12:25, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Aijun, > > Did you actually mean to say that the title should be “SRv6-based BGP Overlay > Services”? If so, I agree. > > Thanks, > Ketan > > From: BESS <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Aijun Wang > Sent: 09 December 2020 08:43 > To: 'Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)' <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for > draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-05 > > Hi, All: > > Support its publication. > > One comments for the document: > Should the name of document be changed to “BGP based SRv6 overlay services” > to reflect its actual scope? > This document discusses just the distribution of SRv6 service label > distribution via BGP. As also stated in the document, it also applies in the > plain IPv6 forwarding environment. > > > Best Regards > > Aijun Wang > China Telecom > > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bocci, > Matthew (Nokia - GB) > Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 1:16 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for > draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-05 > > This email starts a two-week working group last call for > draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-05 [1] > > Please review the draft and send any comments to the BESS list. Also, please > indicate if you support publishing the draft as a standards track RFC. > > This poll runs until Monday 14th December 2020. > > We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this > Document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR > rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). > > If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document please > respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any > relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document won't progress without answers from > all the Authors and Contributors. > There is currently one IPR disclosure. > > In addition, we are polling for knowledge of implementations of this draft, > per the BESS policy in [2]. > > Thank you, > Matthew & Stephane > > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services/ > [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
