Hi Ben,
happy Holidays!
The Reserved field, resulting from our discussion with Jeff Haas, is gone
in the working version of the document:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| BFD Mode |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| BFD Discriminator |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~ Optional TLVs ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Thank you for your comments and discussion.
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 4:52 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for addressing my discuss (and comment!) points.
>
> Given what I have read so far in Alvaro's ballot thread, I had expected
> the Reserved field to be removed from the BFD Discriminator attribute
> format, but I will let that play out in Alvaro's ballot thread.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
