Thanks, Jorge! Barry
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 2:49 PM Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Barry, > > > > Thank you very much for the review. > > I made all the changes that you suggested, they will be there in the next > version. > > > > Thanks! > > Jorge > > > > --------------------------------------- > > > > From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[email protected]> > > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 4:20 PM > > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia > - GB) <[email protected]>, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: > (with COMMENT) > > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd-11: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-proxy-arp-nd/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Just some very small points; please consider them, but there’s no need to > > respond. > > > > Please expand “EVPN” in the title, abstract, and introduction. > > > > It’s also not necessary to include the abbreviations for IXP, DC, and BD > (which > > is misspelled as “DB”) in the abstract, as they’re each only used once there > > and are included in Section 1. > > > > Even after having “DC” and “IXP” defined, it seems better to me to spell them > > out in the section titles of 2.1 (“The Data Center Use Case”) and 2.2 (“The > > Internet Exchange Point Use Case”). Maybe consider that for Sections 5.5 and > > 5.6 as well. > > > > And throughout the document, “use case” doesn’t need a hyphen and shouldn’t > > have one. > > > > _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
