I just read the document and it seems reasonable. I support publication. Thanks, Acee
From: Idr <idr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <sha...@ndzh.com> Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 7:12 AM To: IDR List <i...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: [Idr] IDR WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 (3/11 to 3/25/2021) This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-01 from 3/11 to 3/25. You can find the draft at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry/ This draft suggest a cleanup on several BGP Extended Community registries in order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus misleading. In your review comments, please include whether you feel this draft is ready for publication. Since Adrian’s registry draft (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry) was improved when sent to a wider audience, we the bess WG to also provide comments. To aid in quick review, I’ve included a short portion from the Introduction of this draft. Cheers, Sue =============================== [RFC7153] reorganizes the IANA registries for the type values and sub-type values of the BGP Extended Communities attribute. As a result the IANA maintained registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended Community Types" includes a range of Type Values (0x80-0x8F) with Experimental Use registration procedure. Out of this experimental range the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 have been assigned via [RFC5575] and [RFC7674]. The primary use for those types and sub-type registries is non experimental. Section 2 of this document requests the registry cleanup to reflect the actual use of those code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from the sub-type registry names) and changes the registration procedure of the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 to first come first serve.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
