Hi Gyan,
After our BESS session , this draft has been put in queue. Usually one by one 
draft will be polled from queue

Mankamana

From: Gyan Mishra <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 6:51 AM
To: "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)" <[email protected]>, "Mankamana Mishra 
(mankamis)" <[email protected]>, "Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)" 
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
"[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Cc: BESS <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: [E] New Version Notification for 
draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases-08.txt
Resent-From: <[email protected]>
Resent-To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, 
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, 
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Resent-Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 6:51 AM

Dear Chairs

I would like to ask for WG Adoption call for draft below:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases/


Thank. You

Gyan

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Gyan Mishra <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:22 PM
Subject: Fwd: [E] New Version Notification for 
draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases-08.txt
To: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
 Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
Lili Wang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Simpson, Adam 1. 
(Nokia - US/Mountain View) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Qing Yang 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Chenshuanglong 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Pengshuping 
(Peng Shuping) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Greg 
Mirsky <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Michael McBride 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Adrian 
Farrel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ron Bonica 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Kaliraj Vairavakkalai 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Aijun Wang 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Huaimo Chen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Gengxuesong 
(Geng Xuesong) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
Xiejingrong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jeffrey 
(Zhaohui) Zhang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, zhang.zheng 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Tony Li 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Tony Przygienda 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Toerless Eckert 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain 
View) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>


Dear BESS WG, Chairs & AD

I have updated the IPv4 NLRI over IPv6 Next hop use case interop draft with 
significant updates that strictly focuses on the primary use case.

I added a section on the RFC 8950 updates to RFC 5549.  As this draft focus is 
solely on SAFI 1 IPv4 NLRI over IPv6 NH the updates in RFC 8950 are not related 
to this SAFI as they only pertain to SAFI 128 & 129 which are out of scope of 
this interop testing.

We confirmed early last year during a call with Stephane Litkowski that the 
next hop encoding defined in both RFC 5549 update RFC 8950 includes any BGP 
peer next hop encoding so inclusive of external as well as internal BGP.

This use case draft will focus primarily on the main goal of the draft which is 
the PE-CE Edge peering use case that exists in any Operator both Enterprise or 
Service Provider Data Center.

Option # 1 AFI/SAFI 1/1 IPv4 Unicast -  This is the main use case and primary 
SAFI to be tested called out by the draft.

The MAJOR benefit with this draft is the elimination of all IPv4 peering at the 
edge, so IPv6 can now be the ubiquitous transport within the core as well as 
now at the edge.   This use case draft addresses worldwide IPv4 address 
depletion issues that plague operators around the world.  Thus helps with the 
further proliferation of IPv6. This draft also now cuts down the 1 for1 IPv4 & 
IPv6 peering on dual stacked edges in half thus drastically reducing OPEX and 
maintenance cost for operators.

With this new enhancement of now IPv6 transport style peering at the edge 
operators as well as customers can now take advantage of the much needed per 
flow load balancing BGP Multpath ECMP capability that can be employed with the 
IPv6 flow label RFC 6437 5-tuple input key to hash function for uniform load 
balancing.  This will also provide operators with another significant benefit 
to move quickly to IPv6 as now a new value added offering of per flow load 
balancing can occur at  L3 at the edge  providing a viable alternative to EVPN 
for DCI all active multi home as well as can enhance ACTN &  SR  / MPLS Network 
slicing for 5G & DETNET as well as future APN marking capabilities.

! IPv4 NLRI over IPv6 NH
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases/

Please review the draft and provide comments.  I will be presenting the draft 
at IETF 110.  Presentation attached.  (Mankamana - Please see attachment for 
IETF 110)

As we have made significant progress with this draft with 5 major vendors on 
board now, I would like to request chairs for a  WG Adoption poll during IETF 
110.

We have added QA lab points of contact  from the following 5 vendors below all 
of which have confirmed support of the eBGP PE-CE edge peering use case for 
next hop encoding of IPv4 NLRI over IPv6 next hop.

I have updated the draft from Standards Track to BCP.  The goal of this draft 
is to provide operators a comfort level based on QA testing from the 5 major 
vendors below that they can now start the proliferation of this new BCP across 
all operator networks.

We had to limit the testing and number of vendors to a reasonable set to 
capture the majority of the industry with the MAJOR vendors interop testing to 
make this logistically feasible.  The goal is that the other vendors across the 
globe will support and follow suit to help with the proliferation of IPv6 and 
elimination of IPv4 at the edge.

Authors:
Gyan Mishra - Primary Author - Editor Verizon
Jeff Tantsura-  Apstra - Technical SME

5 vendors POCs Co-authors for interoperability testing:
Mankamana Mishra - Cisco
Lili Wang - Juniper
Qing Yang - Arista
Chenshuanglong- Huawei
Adam Simpson - Nokia

 Warm welcome to the QA interoperability testing team!!



Kind Regards

Gyan


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mishra, Gyan S 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:20 PM
Subject: Fwd: [E] New Version Notification for 
draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases-08.txt
To: Gyan S. Mishra <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:14 PM
Subject: [E] New Version Notification for 
draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases-08.txt
To: Adam Simpson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
Gyan Mishra <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jeff 
Tantsura <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Lili Wang 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Mankamana Mishra 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Qing Yang 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Shuanglong Chen 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>



A new version of I-D, draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases-08.txt
has been successfully submitted by Gyan Mishra and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-mishra-bess-ipv4nlri-ipv6nh-use-cases
Revision:       08
Title:          IPv4 NLRI with IPv6 Next Hop Use Cases
Document date:  2021-02-22
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          13
URL:            
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_archive_id_draft-2Dmishra-2Dbess-2Dipv4nlri-2Dipv6nh-2Duse-2Dcases-2D08.txt&d=DwICaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=DnUkF34wu4mqq0UY8nn2rxBBO7qOW_D-RfNVLML28ZU&m=LxogRCq2s223dBbhKt5DcJfHu4meDCz0beysNdrDiMA&s=A-N39xPuUYwA_GRz71tJlTsy6t2p9V_2rbW-EZmwTZA&e=
Status:         
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dmishra-2Dbess-2Dipv4nlri-2Dipv6nh-2Duse-2Dcases_&d=DwICaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=DnUkF34wu4mqq0UY8nn2rxBBO7qOW_D-RfNVLML28ZU&m=LxogRCq2s223dBbhKt5DcJfHu4meDCz0beysNdrDiMA&s=GTWBonCmR3CyCnjLmbT4iE45otpEOgrUP0pWYunL7-I&e=
Htmlized:       
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Dmishra-2Dbess-2Dipv4nlri-2Dipv6nh-2Duse-2Dcases&d=DwICaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=DnUkF34wu4mqq0UY8nn2rxBBO7qOW_D-RfNVLML28ZU&m=LxogRCq2s223dBbhKt5DcJfHu4meDCz0beysNdrDiMA&s=KSdoBqsaQo9tom9HL7huoOwNBzpKDwmYkP_dJKaDzG0&e=
Htmlized:       
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dmishra-2Dbess-2Dipv4nlri-2Dipv6nh-2Duse-2Dcases-2D08&d=DwICaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=DnUkF34wu4mqq0UY8nn2rxBBO7qOW_D-RfNVLML28ZU&m=LxogRCq2s223dBbhKt5DcJfHu4meDCz0beysNdrDiMA&s=tssyOYOYNrjNO6w2jVgT-LadZBus5z-nzmo-2prklLc&e=
Diff:           
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl2-3Ddraft-2Dmishra-2Dbess-2Dipv4nlri-2Dipv6nh-2Duse-2Dcases-2D08&d=DwICaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=DnUkF34wu4mqq0UY8nn2rxBBO7qOW_D-RfNVLML28ZU&m=LxogRCq2s223dBbhKt5DcJfHu4meDCz0beysNdrDiMA&s=Lx7HzdD4pBEuPFELnA29-B-sT5ZcXPUjAZjreoHshw8&e=

Abstract:
   As Enterprises and Service Providers upgrade their brown field or
   green field MPLS/SR core to an IPv6 transport such as MPLS LDPv6, SR-
   MPLSv6 or SRv6, Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP)now plays an important role
   in the transition of the core from IPv4 to IPv6 being able to
   continue to support legacy IPv4, VPN-IPv4, and Multicast VPN IPv4
   customers.

   This document describes the critical use case and OPEX savings of
   being able to leverage the MP-BGP capability exchange usage as a pure
   transport allowing both IPv4 and IPv6 to be carried over the same BGP
   TCP session.  By doing so, allows for the elimination of Dual
   Stacking on the PE-CE connections making the peering IPv6-ONLY to now
   carry both IPv4 and IPv6 Network Layer Reachability Information
   (NLRI).  This document now provides a solution for IXPs (Internet
   Exchange points) that are facing IPv4 address depletion at these
   peering points to use BGP-MP capability exchange defined in [RFC5549]
   to carry IPv4 (Network Layer Reachability Information) NLRI in an
   IPv6 next hop using the [RFC5565] softwire mesh framework.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
tools.ietf.org<http://tools.ietf.org>.

The IETF Secretariat

--

[Image removed by sender.]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect, SME & Protocol Design Expert

Data Center Planning | Common Core | Development & Engineering Lab Services
Global Technology Services | ITNUC

O 240 970-6287
M 301 502-1347
13101 Columbia Pike Rm 304-D
Silver Spring, MD 20904



IETF  & ISOC Member since 2015

https://www.ietf.org/

https://www.internetsociety.org/




--

[Image removed by sender.]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

M 301 502-1347
13101 Columbia Pike

Silver Spring, MD

--

[Image removed by sender.]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

Email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

M 301 502-1347

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to