Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the document and thanks to David Black for TSVART review. Nits/comments: * P-MAC and C-MAC are these defined somewhere else? References would be nice here. * Section 1.3, Section 2.1 and Section 2.2 describes P nodes in different ways and that has created confusion to me. Can this be well defined in the terminology section once and just be used in other place? * Section 2.5 : "[802.3]" is this supposed to be a reference? it leads to nowhere. * Section 3.1.1.2.1 : first time encountered "network management station (NMS)", if this document is not introducing it then I would suggest to at this to section 1.3 and add some descriptive texts, otherwise define it. * Section 3.1.2.1 : would be nice to expand MTU. * Section 3.2.1: I can't really parse - "EVPN Network OAM SHOULD provide mechanisms for measuring packet loss for a given service [RFC7680] [RFC6673]." are these IPPM mechanisms recommended to be used for EVPN networks? or are those merely examples? _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
