Alvaro
Thank you for the added piece of information. I am clearing my DISCUSS tomorrow
(past midnight here).
Regards
-éric
-----Original Message-----
From: iesg <iesg-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Alvaro Retana
<aretana.i...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 17 May 2021 at 23:34
To: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>, Eric Vyncke
<evyn...@cisco.com>, The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: Matthew Bocci <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>, "Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)"
<manka...@cisco.com>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" <bess-cha...@ietf.org>,
"draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperat...@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperat...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org"
<bess@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Éric:
Hi!
MSDP (from 2003) is an IPv4-only protocol.
Also, take a look at rfc4611/BCP121 (MSDP Deployment Scenarios) which
mentions other IPv6 alternatives which makes any extension of MSDP
unnecessary.
Alvaro.
On May 17, 2021 at 2:10:13 AM, Éric Vyncke wrote:
> == DISCUSS ==
> While I am an expert neither in multicast not in VPN, I wonder why this
> document is only about IPv4 and not a single word is written about IPv6.
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
