Thanks Alvaro, > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The concept of an "SR domain identifier" is not part of rfc8402; it is > casually > introduced in ยง3: "A route target ([RFC4360]) is attached to each GW's > auto-discovery route and has its value set to the SR domain identifier." This > is a significant change to the SR architecture. > > In line with the general use of the mechanism in this document (from John's > DISCUSS), I believe it is unnecessary to add anything new to the SR > architecture. Instead, the term could be changed to simply "local domain > identifier" (or something like that).
This ties into other comments on the thread: we should have used the term "site" not "domain" as the meaning of "SR domain" is already nailed down in 8402. An almost global change of "domain" to "site" will be made in -11. While this doesn't change the casualness or otherwise of the document, it does prevent any changes to the SR architecture. Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
