Hi Adrian, > -----Original Message----- > From: iesg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: 19 May 2021 15:03 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; 'The IESG' <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; 'Matthew Bocci' > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-datacenter- > gateway-10: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Rob, > > Interesting question. > > > COMMENT: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > The draft has a manageability considerations section - thanks - but I > would > > like to check whether assignment of the SR domain identifier would > expect to be > > configured via YANG? If so, is there a YANG data model in the works > that will > > cover this functionality? Having an informational reference to the data > model > > may be helpful to readers. > > It is hard to predict the expectations in this regard. > CLI, TL/1, YANG, DHCP? > > I think that in the fullness of time, if the approach described in this > document takes off, then I would expect to see YANG management available. > At the moment, however, I'm not aware of any work (presumably to augment > BGP and/or SR models), so nothing to point at. > > Compare and contrast with how VPN IDs are configured, and how long we > lived with VPNs before we had a "standard" way to configure them. [RW]
Thanks for the information. The unfortunate downside to this approach is that it is much harder to get agreement on what the configuration & operational data model should look like if every vendor has created their own version ... Regards, Rob > > Cheers, > Adrian _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
