Hi Jorge,
Glad to be useful, and will be using for the next revision to review the changes
Judging by the difference in the size of the two documents (RFC 7432 is 56
pages while the draft is 65 pages) the section that describes the changes would
make such a review much more feasible for me.
Regards,
Sasha
Office: +972-39266302
Cell: +972-549266302
Email: [email protected]
From: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:11 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Michael Gorokhovsky <[email protected]>;
Alexander Ferdman <[email protected]>; Luc André Burdet
<[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFC7432bis : Request for review
Hi Sasha,
That is very helpful feedback, and adding a section about the changes makes
sense to me.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: Alexander Vainshtein
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 5:16 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
US/Mountain View) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
Michael Gorokhovsky
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Alexander
Ferdman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Luc
André Burdet <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: RFC7432bis : Request for review
Hi authors and contributors of draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis.
I have started reading the draft in hope to find a section that describes the
differences between the original RFC 7432 and the "bis" draft for this RFC.
AFAIK, such sections are quite customary when a "bis" revision of an already
approved and published RFC is proposed.
Unfortunately, there seems to be no such section in the draft, and looking for
the differences in a 64-page document is quite non-trivial.
This may be one of the reasons why no comments have appeared at the BESS WG
mailing list in 5 months following the draft posting.
May I suggest that you add such a section (or Appendix) to the next revision of
the draft?
Looking just at the tables of contents of RFC 7432 and of the draft I see that
the following new sections have been added (could have missed some items)
7.9<https://clicktime.symantec.com/3NxCNy2mxkGc6BKRi3JZ9r16H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-7.9>.
EVPN Layer 2 Attributes Extended Community
7.9.1<https://clicktime.symantec.com/36d1PB75YAkaqe7nar6K3mi6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-7.9.1>.
EVPN Layer 2 Attributes Partitioning
7.12<https://clicktime.symantec.com/35FxGTNaL4Yid6DfW1CxQXn6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-7.12>.
Route Prioritization
10.1.1<https://clicktime.symantec.com/3WZS1PJE1319p3ZCAdeGNwZ6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-10.1.1>.
Best Path selection for Default Gateway
15.2<https://clicktime.symantec.com/39uEWVQWDBT6T5y6pmbRgGQ6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-15.2>.
Sticky MAC Addresses
18.1<https://clicktime.symantec.com/3PBmbBk5XQMkaZzYdG5KbKf6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-18.1>.
Flow Label
19<https://clicktime.symantec.com/3Hr2wMPrjec3vB4r4SnWjq66H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00%23section-19>.
Use of Domain-wide Common Block (DCB) Labels
There are also some changes in the text of the sections that have existed in
RFC 743. E.g., I see reference to BIER in the draft that do not exist in RFC
7432.
Tracking such changes would be quite difficult without the authors' help in the
form of a "Summary of changes from RFC 7432" section/Appendix.
Such a section, if added, would be also included in the resulting RFC.
Hopefully this comment will be useful.
Regards,
Sasha
Office: +972-39266302
Cell: +972-549266302
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
From: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of
Luc Andr? Burdet
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 9:59 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [bess] RFC7432bis : Request for review
Hi,
The update to RFC7432 is an important draft for the WG - could you please
review offline and provide feedback?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis<https://clicktime.symantec.com/3Hss71ZoqyYVo1fFGH3PvdW6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis>
I would like to incorporate feedback into a new version published before IETF
111, or discuss then any substantive content
Regards,
Luc André Burdet | Cisco |
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | Tel: +1 613 254 4814
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or
proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or
proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or
proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments._______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
