Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- No objection as I didn't notice any transport related issues. However, idnits check returned some outdated references see below - == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps has been published as RFC 9012 == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-03 == Outdated reference: A later version (-11) exists of draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-10 and downref ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7348 ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7637 Some more nits I found as I read through: -- Section 7 : s/expexted/expected, s/moblity/mobility _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
