Greg

Thank you

I am good to close the implementation poll, but I believe there may be some 
outstanding comments to address from Saumya on the other thread. Please can you 
look at that?

Thanks

Matthew

From: Greg Mirsky <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, 3 September 2021 at 15:41
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <[email protected]>, BESS <[email protected]>
Cc: John E Drake <[email protected]>, 
[email protected] <[email protected]>, 
[email protected] 
<[email protected]>, Greg Mirsky <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
Hi Matthew and BESS WG,
I was informed that our product does support using most of the sub-TLVs defined 
in the draft. Please let me know if you have any further questions regarding 
the implementation.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 2:36 PM 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Matthew,

my apologies for the belated response:

  1.  I am still awaiting a response from our product team on whether any part 
of the draft is supported.
  2.  I concur with Ali. LSP Ping is a broadly used OAM tool detecting and 
localizing failures, including discrepancies between the data and control 
planes. The document defines necessary Target FEC sub-TLVs for EVPN and MVPN 
cases.



Regards,

Greg Mirsky



Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D 
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division


[cid:[email protected]]
[cid:[email protected]]
E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.zte.com.cn<http://www.zte.com.cn/>
Original Mail
Sender: JohnEDrake
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - 
GB);[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
Date: 2021/08/31 11:34
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
Hi,

I agree with Ali.

Yours Irrespectively,

John



Juniper Business Use Only
From: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On Behalf Of 
Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 9:54 PM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Matthew,

Some of the co-authors are on PTO and I couldn’t reach them (typical of the 
month of August). So, I’d like to get a bit more extension.

Regarding the two questions below:

  1.  My company hasn’t implemented it.
  2.  I do think that we should process with the publication as it describes 
how LSP ping can be used to detect data-plane failures for various EVPN 
functionality including aliasing, split-horizon filtering using ESI label, 
multicast, l2-unicast, l3-unicast, IRB, etc. For MPLS transport tunnel, I am 
not aware of any other tool/draft that allows us to do data-plane failure 
detection. Thus, I think it is important to proceed with its publications.

Still I’d like to hear from other co-authors and other people in this community.

Regards,
Ali

From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, August 9, 2021 at 6:25 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
WG and Authors

Unfortunately I have not seen any responses indicating that there are any known 
implementations of this draft. I also did not see any responses to Stephane's 
question if we should proceed regardless.

As per the BESS WG implementation policy 
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4v8nM3No$>),
 please can you respond to this email indicating either:

- That you are aware of any implementations (ideally providing some details)
- If you are not aware of any, if you think the WG should proceed with the 
draft's publication and why.

I will close this poll on 25th August 2021.

Regards

Matthew


On 14/06/2021, 17:38, "BESS on behalf of 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected] on behalf of 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]%20on%20behalf%20of%[email protected]>>
 wrote:


    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
    This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.

            Title           : LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
            Authors         : Parag Jain
                              Samer Salam
                              Ali Sajassi
                              Sami Boutros
                              Greg Mirsky
         Filename        : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt
         Pages           : 15
         Date            : 2021-06-14

    Abstract:
       LSP-Ping is a widely deployed Operation, Administration, and
       Maintenance (OAM) mechanism in MPLS networks.  This document
       describes mechanisms for detecting data-plane failures using LSP Ping
       in MPLS based EVPN and PBB-EVPN networks.


    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4CFZvJAM$>

    There is also an htmlized version available at:
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4RLT2-5Q$>

    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli44UwE5yg$>


    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp:/ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4trDqUTY$>


    _______________________________________________
    BESS mailing list
    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
    
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4YoTqkAc$>


_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to