Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Much thanks to Scott Bradner for the OpsDir review (-09), discussions and then re-review of -11. Jeffrey has agreed to change the SHOULD at the ned of S5.3.1 to a MUST (see OpsDir thread), and I'm balloting NoObj with the assumption that that will happen. Thanks again to Scott and the authors; I think that the comments since -09 have noticeably improved the document. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
