Hi Eduard, Sounds like a reasonable request to me. We’ll look into it for the next version. Thank you! Jorge
From: Vasilenko Eduard <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 7:09 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Is draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking compatible to all potential use cases? Dear Authors, You have normative references only for RFC7432 and RFC4364 types of services. RFC4659<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4659> and RFC8950<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8950> are missing in normative and informative. Why? Especially when you effectively included the support for IPv6 AFI inside the definition of “ISF SAFI”: The ISF SAFIs are 1 (including IPv4 and IPv6 AFIs), 128 (including IPv4 and IPv6 AFIs) and 70 (EVPN, including only AFI 25). I have read your draft and do not see a problem to claim support for these use cases too. [cid:[email protected]] Best Regards Eduard Vasilenko Senior Architect Europe Standardization & Industry Development Department Tel: +7(985) 910-1105, +7(916) 800-5506
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
