Hi Authors
While going through this I have a couple of other comments:
Please can you clean up the use of RFC2119 language, in particular capitalizing
SHOULD, MUST etc where appropriate. For example, I think the following in
Section 4.3 should be corrected:
Ethernet Tag field value in EVPN Ethernet AD Sub-TLV, should be set
according to the context:
o For per-ES context, the Ethernet Tag field in the sub-TLV must be
set to the reserved MAX-ET value
[RFC7432<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432>]
o For per-EVI context, the Ethernet Tag field in the sub-TLV must be
set to the non-reserved value
Thanks
Matthew
From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, 2 February 2022 at 16:00
To: [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: ID-Nits for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping
Hi Authors
I am finally doing the document shepherds write up for this draft. ID Nits
throws up a few warnings, which I would appreciate if you could fix now before
I request publication:
https://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-06.txt
Thanks
Matthew
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
