Hi Martin, Thanks for your review and comments/inputs. We are in discussion with John to address his concerns (some of which are shared by you).
Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:56 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Having received a response to my DISCUSS, it's apparently common practice > in > this area to have routers be non-interoperable without a priori knowledge > of > neighbor capabilities. I still support John Scudder's second DISCUSS, but > if > he's happy, I'm happy. > > This document was very difficult to follow without a thorough grounding in > the > references, but I managed to have some comments anyway: > > - I support John Scudder's second DISCUSS. > > - Please expand VRF, SLA, RIB, NLRI, and all other acronyms on first use. > > (3.2.1) " The Transposition Offset MUST be less than LBL+LNL+FL+AL > > The sum of Transposition Offset and Transposition Length MUST be > less than LBL+LNL+FL+AL" > > The second condition makes the first redundant for all Transposition > Length >= > 0! It makes me think there's a typo. > > (5) and (6) "The SRv6 Service SID SHOULD be routable within the AS of the > egress > PE" > > SHOULD? Under what circumstances would it be OK for it not to be routable? > [I > see Alvaro also commented on this, but I'd like to call out that Sec 6 > does the > same thing] > > > >
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
