Thanks Murray for comment. Attached diff is being published in next 15 min (sorry tool has some issue, so upload is failing).
It address your comment . From: Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> Date: Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:43 PM To: John E Drake <[email protected]> Cc: BESS <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) <[email protected]>, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [bess] Fwd: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-14: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 8:04 AM John E Drake <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: [JD] We will change the SHOULD to a MUST in sections 9.1 and 9.1.3. The SHOULD in sections 9.1.1, 9.2.1, and 9.3.1 are fine; there are RDs of other types and everything will work if they are used but type 1 is preferred because it provides the address of the route originator. If you would like, we can add this explanation to those sections Yes, that would be ideal. Thanks! -MSK
<<< text/html; name="Diff draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-19.txt - draft-ietf-bess-evpn-igmp-mld-proxy-20.txt.html": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
