Any thoughts on below. ?

Regards,
Saumya.

From: Dikshit, Saumya [mailto:saumya.diks...@hpe.com]
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 5:30 PM
To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Sunnyvale) <jorge.raba...@nokia.com>; Luc André 
Burdet <laburdet.i...@gmail.com>; Sergey Fomin <i...@sergey.dev>; bess@ietf.org
Cc: draft-saum-bess-dampening-back...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bess] FW: New Version Notification for 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt

Hi Jorge, Luc,

Regarding comments in the ietf-113 regarding this draft being qualified as 
“informational”.
I was thinking, that freezing policy should be propagated to as many BGP-EVPN 
peers as possible to ensure,
the freezing and defreezing can be organic and eventually leading to freeze to 
infinity.

That way, this capability (not as in BGP capability) may need to be carried in 
BGP update messages between BGP-EVPN peers, (if not per-ESI/EVI granularity).
Let me know your thoughts on the same.
I don’t see the problem getting resolved in this text: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-04#section-15<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-04#section-15>

Thanks
Saumya.

From: Dikshit, Saumya [mailto:saumya.diks...@hpe.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 6:58 PM
To: Sergey Fomin <i...@sergey.dev<mailto:i...@sergey.dev>>; 
bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc: 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-back...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-saum-bess-dampening-back...@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [bess] FW: New Version Notification for 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt

Hi Sergey and Group members

A new version of draft is available with comments addressed: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-01<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-01>
Please provide your inputs.

Thanks
Saumya.

From: Dikshit, Saumya
Sent: Saturday, September 4, 2021 4:16 PM
To: Sergey Fomin <i...@sergey.dev<mailto:i...@sergey.dev>>; 
bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Cc: 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-back...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-saum-bess-dampening-back...@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [bess] FW: New Version Notification for 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt

Hi Sergey,

Thanks for your review and comments. Please find my response inline with tag 
[SD].

Thanks
Saumya.

From: Sergey Fomin [mailto:i...@sergey.dev]
Sent: Saturday, September 4, 2021 8:07 AM
To: Dikshit, Saumya <saumya.diks...@hpe.com<mailto:saumya.diks...@hpe.com>>; 
bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [bess] FW: New Version Notification for 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt


Hi authors,

I have a few general comments

  1.  The introduction (section 2) is confusing. You start by saying that 
RFC7432 addresses the duplication issue (which is mostly right), but then start 
to describe “an unending cycle”..

And just to be clear: RFC7432 does not prescribe an automatic recovery action, 
it’s always a choice (also relevant to p.3 below)

[SD]I agree, that’s open ended as far as RFC7432 is concerned. That’s what we 
intend to call-out/address in this document.



  1.  I’m not entirely sure why did you add section 2.2 with a broadcast loop 
via backdoor link to this draft? [SD] My intention was not to show a backdoor 
path but a network loop on the same PE device (VTEP). A loops between, let’s 
say, two layer-2 tenant ports (switchports) configured over same 
VLAN/bridge-domain on the PEs. I will update this in the next revision.
[SD]This issue is observed in existing EVPN deployments, wherein, the Vxlan 
fabric operator does not have any hold/control on the way tenant network is 
managed/operated. And any such errors like l2-looping will have an impact on 
the shared fabric as it will lead to never ending mac movement.
Anyhow this problem was addressed in draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-protect (there 
are a few implementations), and became a part of the updated -7432bis draft.
[SD] For backdoor links, problem for sure is addressed via method mentioned in 
draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-protect and merged with 7432.  Let me go through 
draft-snr-bess-evpn-loop-protect once more to firm up the author’s 
understanding.


  1.  The problem statement (section 4) is very vague and hardly justifies the 
existence of this draft:

> It is observed that plethora of implementations defreeze the MAC in 
> deterministic

>   time after freezing it with a positive assumption that admin shall

>  take corrective action meanwhile.  Else, the subsequent unfreeze

>   shall end up in the same cycle of MAC Duplication detection and

>   freezing the MAC.

It is an implementation detail, and nothing prevents you from doing it in a 
configurable (or any other way) you want.

[SD] If I see it the other way, then “count” and “timer’ based implementation 
for arriving at MAC-duplication conclusion is also one way of implementing it. 
It’s just that this way of implementation has been standardized.



“Plethora” might be a bad choice of wording: I know at least 3 different 
implementations from major vendors that provide the flexibility by giving a 
choice to a user whether auto-retry should be enabled, with configurable delay 
parameters etc.

[SD]I agree ”Plethora” is a bad choice of words and we will be more specific in 
the next revision. But I been involved in couple of implementations at-least 
and can’t vouch for the third and fourth’s current state.

If you just want to expand on these options and document them, that might be 
fine (although you may want to choose informational vs standard track?), but 
this need to be more explicitly stated.

[SD] Please provide your inputs on firming up on existing options and any more 
you have in mind. It will be great to hear from you on that.

--

Sergey



-----Original Message-----
From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of 
Dikshit, Saumya
Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 5:35 AM
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>; 
bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] FW: New Version Notification for 
draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt



Hello Bess WG members,



Requesting you to please provide your review comments on the draft 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt>.

This draft intends to provide the optimal solution of dampening a Duplicate MAC 
as described in 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432#section-15.1<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7432#section-15.1>



Please let us know your thoughts on the solution proposed in this document.



Thanks



-----Original Message-----

From: internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org> 
[mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]

Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 4:08 PM

To: Dikshit, Saumya <saumya.diks...@hpe.com<mailto:saumya.diks...@hpe.com>>; 
Shankar, Swathi <swathi.shan...@hpe.com<mailto:swathi.shan...@hpe.com>>; Joshi, 
Vinayak <vinayak.jo...@hpe.com<mailto:vinayak.jo...@hpe.com>>

Subject: New Version Notification for draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt





A new version of I-D, draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt

has been successfully submitted by Saumya Dikshit and posted to the IETF 
repository.



Name:                  draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff

Revision:              00

Title:                      EVPN Mac Dampening Back-off

Document date:               2021-08-23

Group:                  Individual Submission

Pages:                   11

URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff-00.txt>

Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff/>

Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-saum-bess-dampening-backoff>





Abstract:

   MAC move handling in EVPN deployments is discussed in detail in

   [RFC7432].  There are few optimizations which can be done in existing

   way of handling the mac duplication.  This document describes few of

   the potential techniques to do so.









The IETF Secretariat





_______________________________________________

BESS mailing list

BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to