Hello Susan,
I have read the drafts and I support BGP-CT. Both the approaches are
functionally identical, but I think BGP-CT is easier to understand,
implement, troubleshoot and has a lesser learning curve.
Thanks
Santosh P K
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 12:35 AM Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> BESS:
>
>
>
> Today we started the WG adoption call for the
>
> the CAR/CT drafts. This adoption call has
>
> the following two parts:
>
>
>
> Part-1: Questions on technology direction
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/FhoK04HsSy9tR7ioV7AD0Vv6Ir4/
>
>
>
> Part-2: Adoption of the drafts
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/AP_ClbZgpkX6CNy7TaZiU8SMD5w/
>
>
>
> The IDR Chairs need to hear from IDR and BESS WG members
>
> (operators, implementers, academics and architects).
>
> Please help us by sharing your thoughts on the technology direction
>
> and the adoption.
>
>
>
> The BESS WG has a long history of working
>
> with VPN so we’d like to hear their view on this technology direction
>
> as well as the adoption of these drafts. We’ll be querying the BESS
> chairs for
>
> their view of consensus on this adoption call so you can also talk to them
>
> about this draft.
>
>
>
> Cheers, Sue Hares
>
> (IDR co-chair and shepherd for this adoption call)
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
