Hi Ali,
Thank you for this email.
We will surely provide our input for the LSP Ping draft ASAP, had we not done
it already.
I will touch base with Alexander Vainshtein who claims to have found several
issues and return back with our input if not shared already.
When LSP Ping becomes RFC; surely we will not issue an errata for EVPN FRR
before the latter becomes a formal WG draft.
We are on the same page.
Much obliged,
Nitsan
From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 8:08 PM
To: Nitsan Dolev <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Parag Jain (paragj)
<[email protected]>; Luc Andre Burdet (lburdet) <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein <[email protected]>; Ron Sdayoor
<[email protected]>; Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for
EVPN
Hi Nitsan,
There are a few other extensions that we have in mind for the bis version which
Parag and I want to incorporate. However, we don't want to rush that and want
to allow time for the new RFC to soak (just like RFC7432) and gather all inputs
before doing a bis. We welcome your input (and your collaboration) on the bis
version.
BTW, draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03 is just an individual draft. It is
not even WG draft. So, even writing an errata for lsp-ping RFC to cover an
individual draft is NOT appropriate! And you should wait till that draft
becomes at least a WG draft.
Cheers,
Ali
From: Nitsan Dolev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 12:20 AM
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
Parag Jain (paragj) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Luc Andre
Burdet (lburdet) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ron
Sdayoor <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN
Hi Ali,
Thanks for the prompt response.
I will file an errata for the published RFC.
And we will draft an extension to it in parallel to progress of
draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03
Much oblige,
Nitsan
From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 1:41 AM
To: Nitsan Dolev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Parag Jain (paragj)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Luc Andre Burdet (lburdet)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Ron
Sdayoor <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for
EVPN
Hi Nitsan,
This draft has gone through the WGLC as well as IESG review and we are very
close to its publication (i.e., too late to make such changes). Once it is
published, we welcome enhancements and expansion to this document when needed.
IETF has a formal process of reporting "errata" on a published RFC. We
encourage you to file an errata on this. We will compile all such errata and we
will address them in the bis version of this document.
Cheers,
Ali
From: BESS <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of
Nitsan Dolev <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 7:25 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
Parag Jain (paragj) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Luc Andre
Burdet (lburdet) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Ron
Sdayoor <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [bess] Coverage of ERL label within LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN
Dear authors of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-09 and
draft-burdet-bess-evpn-fast-reroute-03,
Your help with addressing the following question will be most appreciated,
As these two mentioned drafts seem to be under consensus; would not it be right
to address the coverage of ERL label should within the LSP Ping enhancement for
EVPN.
Looking forward to getting your answer,
Nitsan Dolev
Ribbon Communications
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or
proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or
proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or
proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure,
reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
