Shunwan, Good catch! ID length is in bytes and Nonce length is also in bytes. I will update the draft accordingly.
Cheers, Ali From: Zhuangshunwan <[email protected]> Date: Monday, June 12, 2023 at 1:36 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Mail regarding draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn Dear Co-Authors, Thank you for contributing this very useful document! I support the adoption of this document. One comment: Regarding the “ID Length” and “Nonce Length” in the Base (Minimal Set) DIM Sub-TLV, Figure 6 shows the following: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ID Length | Nonce Length |I| Flags | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Rekey | | Counter | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | | ~ Originator ID + (Tenant ID) + (Subnet ID) + (Tenant Address) ~ | | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | | ~ Nonce Data ~ | | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ Figure 6 And the corresponding description is as follows: “ID Length (16 bits) is the length of the Originator ID + (Tenant ID) + (Subnet ID) + (Tenant Address) in bytes. Nonce Length (8 bits) is …” Question: Which is the right format we want? Best Regards, Shunwan
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
