Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 2 defines "BD" but it's not used anywhere in this document. Nor are "NDF", "BDF", "vES", "ISID", or "MAC-VRF". The sole "SHOULD" in Section 4.1 leaves me with two questions: (1) What happens if I don't do this? (2) The sentence itself appears to parse like "You SHOULD do this, but you don't actually have to" which seems like an abuse of BCP 14. I think this is better if you just change "SHOULD" to "should", and drop the BCP 14 references altogether. _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
