Hi Roman, Thanks for reviewing. Your comments, along with John’s and Peter’s should be addressed in version 12 (recently posted).
Let us know if that is not the case, please. Thanks! Jorge From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Date: Friday, August 4, 2023 at 12:20 PM To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org>, bess-cha...@ietf.org <bess-cha...@ietf.org>, bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>, Stephane Litkowski <slitkows.i...@gmail.com>, slitkows.i...@gmail.com <slitkows.i...@gmail.com> Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-11: (with COMMENT) CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Peter Yee for the SECDIR review I’ll repeat his counsel that the Security Considerations should reference the applicability of RFC7432. I support John Scudder’s DISCUSS position.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
