Hi Zaheduzzaman,

Thanks for your review.

Section 4.1 bullet D is now completed as follows in version 12:

“A similar procedure can be used for DF Algorithm Lowest-Preference too, that 
is, suppose the algorithm for vES2 is Lowest-Preference, and PE1 (the DF) goes 
on maintenance mode. The operator could change vES2's Preference on PE1 from 
100 to e.g., 250, so that PE2 is forced to take over as Designated Forwarder 
for vES2.”

Hopefully that addresses your comment.

Thanks!
Jorge

From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org>
Date: Monday, August 7, 2023 at 6:14 AM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org 
<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org>, bess-cha...@ietf.org 
<bess-cha...@ietf.org>, bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>, Stephane Litkowski 
<slitkows.i...@gmail.com>, slitkows.i...@gmail.com <slitkows.i...@gmail.com>
Subject: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-11: 
(with COMMENT)

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.



Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification.

I don't have any transport related points on this specification. However, as
similar != same, it would be great if we can illustrate where the procedure in
section 4.1 bullet D might be different or have different considerations
between Highest-Preference and Lowest-Preference algorithms.


_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to