Top posting again for the attention of our new AD :-)
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 7:40 PM Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> wrote: > Any update on this? > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:03 AM Rebecca VanRheenen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> HI Andrew, >> >> We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as >> editorial. >> Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata >> report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the >> Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/). >> >> You may review the report at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7652 >> >> Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further >> information on how to verify errata reports. >> >> Further information on errata can be found at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. >> >> Thank you. >> >> RFC Editor/rv >> >> >> >> > On Sep 22, 2023, at 1:05 AM, RFC Errata System < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9252, >> > "BGP Overlay Services Based on Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)". >> > >> > -------------------------------------- >> > You may review the report below and at: >> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7652 >> > >> > -------------------------------------- >> > Type: Editorial >> > Reported by: Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> >> > >> > Section: 3.2.1 >> > >> > Original Text >> > ------------- >> > Transposition Offset indicates the bit position, and Transposition >> > Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the >> > SRv6 SID value and encoded in the MPLS Label field. The bits that >> > have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. >> > >> > Corrected Text >> > -------------- >> > Transposition Offset indicates the bit position and Transposition >> > Length indicates the number of bits that are being taken out of the >> > SRv6 SID value and put into high order bits of MPLS label field. The >> > bits that have been shifted out MUST be set to 0 in the SID value. >> > >> > Notes >> > ----- >> > This errata reverses an editorial change that was made during the >> AUTH48 phase and restores the text that came from the WG and IESG review. >> Refer >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15#page-10 >> > >> > This change was made during the AUTH48 since the "high order bits" was >> already covered under various subsections of Sec 6. However, readers have >> reported that there are other places in Sec 6 and Sec 5 where transposition >> also occurs and that the original text was still required. >> > >> > Instructions: >> > ------------- >> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> > >> > -------------------------------------- >> > RFC9252 (draft-ietf-bess-srv6-services-15) >> > -------------------------------------- >> > Title : BGP Overlay Services Based on Segment Routing >> over IPv6 (SRv6) >> > Publication Date : July 2022 >> > Author(s) : G. Dawra, Ed., K. Talaulikar, Ed., R. Raszuk, B. >> Decraene, S. Zhuang, J. Rabadan >> > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> > Source : BGP Enabled ServiceS >> > Area : Routing >> > Stream : IETF >> > Verifying Party : IESG >> > >> >>
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
