I am unaware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks
Jim Uttaro
> On Jun 12, 2025, at 10:32 AM, Wen Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR either.
>
> Thanks,
> Wen
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> From: John Drake <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Thursday, June 12, 2025 at 9:31 AM
> To: 'Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)' <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, 'Ali Sajassi (sajassi)'
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, Wen Lin <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]><[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>,
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [bess] FW: Short new WGLC and IPR poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
> I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
>
> On Thursday, June 12, 2025 at 02:14:28 AM PDT, [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> Just a reminder that this document is blocked for progressing, because we
> still haven’t got IPR replies from all co-authors (at least active ones).
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 3:46 PM
> To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [bess] FW: Short new WGLC and IPR poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12
>
>
>
> Hi Authors,
>
>
>
> Could you please reply to this new IPR poll regarding
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking ?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> Stephane
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 7:59 PM
> To: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12
>
>
>
> Thanks Jorge.
>
>
>
> Yeah, as the IPR call was done a long time ago, I want to ensure we capture
> any new IPR disclosure before we send to IESG.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:00 PM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Stephane
> Litkowski (slitkows) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12
>
>
>
> Hi Stephane,
>
>
>
> Version 13 posted, addressing all the comments in the WG last call.
>
>
>
> Also I’m not aware of any related IPR.
>
> (sorry, it was not clear to me if we, authors, had to reply again with this).
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM
> To: 'Stephane Litkowski (slitkows)' <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>,
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: RE: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12
>
>
>
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext <http://nok.it/ext> for
> additional information.
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> WGLC is now closed.
>
>
>
> We received few comments during this WGLC. Authors, please address them in a
> new version.
>
>
>
> I’m also waiting for the IPR disclosure replies and then we can move forward
> with the draft.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
> From: Stephane Litkowski (slitkows) <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 11:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [bess] Short new WGLC and IPR poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-12
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> As draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking went through multiple discussions
> that seem to be closed now. We would like to do a new short WGLC of 1-week to
> gather any additional comment before we move forward with the draft.
>
>
>
> The WGLC poll starts today and will end on 2/3.
>
>
>
> Similarly, as the last IPR poll was done a long time back. We are also
> polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this document
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Brgds,
>
>
>
>
>
> Stephane, Matthew, Jeffrey (BESS chairs)
>
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
