Hi Deb, Thanks for your review and comment on the BESS charter.
Please see below, prefixed by MB>. Regards Matthew From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Date: Sunday, 22 June 2025 at 23:06 To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org <bess-cha...@ietf.org>, bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Deb Cooley's No Objection on charter-ietf-bess-01-00: (with COMMENT) CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-bess-01-00: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bess/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Paragraph 2, bullet 2: "Any contention in placement of the work will be resolved by the chairs and responsible Area Directors." Has there been issues in the past? I see that there is a version of this in the previous charter. It seems like an unusual statement, since that is the way it usually works? Work that isn't in charter is resolved by either chairs or AD. I guess if it happens often, then spelling it out in the charter makes it crystal clear. [note: I see Med calls this 'business as usual'. I do agree, unless there have been issues in the past.] MB> Agreed. I believe this is a legacy statement from the originally formation of the WG out of L2VPN and L3VPN, to make sure that there were no issues when placing work between the then-new PALs and BESS working groups. I believe this can now be removed.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
