Section 4 appears to state the same requirement at two different strengths. The 
bullets say the VPN-specific IE "SHOULD be preferred", that it is "RECOMMENDED 
not to use the generic" IE for VPN flows, and that collectors "SHOULD 
prioritize" the VPN-specific IE; but a later bullet says the Exporting Process 
"MUST export the bgpVpnNextHopIPv4Address or bgpVpnNextHopIPv6Address IE 
instead of the generic ... IE for VPN flows". Is exporting the VPN-specific IE 
for VPN flows a MUST or a SHOULD? As written the SHOULD/RECOMMENDED bullets and 
the MUST bullet seem to overlap, and it would help interoperability to state 
the single intended normative level (and, if it is SHOULD, to note the valid 
exceptions).

On reference classification: the Terminology section says the document uses 
terms defined in RFC 7011, RFC 8402, and RFC 9252, and terms such as SRv6, 
Segment List, SID, and Segment Routing from RFC 8402 are used throughout the 
prose. RFC 9252 is listed as Normative but RFC 8402 is listed as Informative. 
Since a reader needs the RFC 8402 definitions to understand the document, 
should RFC 8402 be a Normative reference?

On Security Considerations (Section 5): the reconnaissance/privacy discussion 
of exposing egress-PE next-hop addresses, SRv6 service SIDs, and locator 
lengths is a good addition, and the pointer to the RFC 7011/7012 considerations 
is appropriate. Since those IEs are sensitive, would it be worth stating 
explicitly (rather than only by reference) that the exporter-to-collector path 
should use the confidentiality and integrity protection described in RFC 7011 
(e.g., TLS/DTLS), in addition to the at-rest access-control guidance already 
given?

A few editorial nits. Missing spaces: "data plane[RFC8402]" (Sec 1), 
"best-effort(SRv6-BE)" (Sec 1), "new IEs(bgpVpnNextHopIPv4Address..." (Sec 4), 
and "Section 4 of [RFC9252]is used" (Sec 4).

Grammar: "there's no other information that be related with the egress PE" (Sec 
1) reads as if a word is missing - perhaps "that can be related to" or "that is 
related to"?

P.
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to