Sorry, it wasn't meant to be runnable. The rem statement should be replaced 
with all of the necessary wd statements (without the wd) to define the form.

On Mar 15, 2013, at 9:10 PM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:

> Did you missing a pc cmd at the beginning of EXAMPLE?
> 
> Пт, 15 мар 2013, Tom Arneson писал(а):
>> I tried your test function with the following result:
>> 
>>   coclass'example'
>> 
>>   EXAMPLE=: 0 : 0
>> rem form definition
>> )
>> 
>>   test=: 3 : 0
>> wd EXAMPLE
>> wd'pshow'
>> )
>>   test_example_''
>> |pshow : no parent selected: wd
>> |   (wd ::(''"_)'qer')    (13!:8)3
>> 
>> NB. =====================
>> I tried inserting some lines into the form from the cities demo form, but
>> that didn't help.
>> Can someone tell me what I'm missing?
>> Thanks
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Norman Drinkwater
>> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 19:21
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Jbeta] wd interface for Qt
>> 
>> Although the Qt layouts make it more straightforward to generate forms by
>> hand, I've found it useful to add a test function to the script to make sure
>> I'm on the right track. That way I can separate the initialization logic
>> that is usually in the run function. For example:
>> 
>> coclass'example'
>> 
>> EXAMPLE=: 0 : 0
>> rem form definition
>> )
>> 
>> test=: 3 : 0
>> wd EXAMPLE
>> wd'pshow'
>> )
>> 
>> Running test_example_ in the terminal brings up the form and if need be I
>> can go back and adjust the form definition. The usual run or create function
>> contains all of the necessary logic to actually use the form.
>> 
>> Although the above is probably obvious, once I started using this approach,
>> building forms was much quicker and I stopped missing the form editor.
>> 
>> On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:09 PM, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> J8 does support wd and will continue to do so. The format is similar 
>>> but not identical to J6.
>>> 
>>> We haven't bothered with the GUI design tool yet. In J6 and earlier, 
>>> controls had exact xywh positioning which is tedious to get right 
>>> manually, hence the need for a form editor. J8 uses Qt layouts which 
>>> are automatic, so a form editor is not so essential.
>>> 
>>> One possibility is that the output from Qt Creator could be read into 
>>> a J8 wd form definition. But you should find that it is easy enough to 
>>> create J8 forms manually.
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:45 AM, McGuinness, Brian
>>> 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ...If J8 continues to support wd and the GUI design tool, and these 
>>>> work on 64-bit platforms, then I will seriously consider writing 
>>>> GUI-based applications in J once again.  But I'm not interested in 
>>>> playing a constant game of catch-up with an ever-changing platform, 
>>>> and I'm sure most other people feel the same way.
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> ====================================================
> GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to