it could be possible to set the labs under two places one called untested
another tested the users could test those untested and send e-mail stating the name of the lab and environment os etc through a verb picking up such info and sending it to betaforum including eventual fixes if needed one person assigned to move said lab from untested to tested for that os slowly they will thus be moved to tested ever fever untested eventually the same procedure could be used for JHS labs several labs do not need fixes several need only minor fixes anorher verb could be used to report info about state of lab needing fixes in one os On Mar 19, 2013 3:45 AM, "bill lam" <[email protected]> wrote: > Who will test? The result in J7 is not so encouraging. > > Вт, 19 мар 2013, Björn Helgason писал(а): > > I think it would be good to add the labs to qt slowly like one at a time > > and only after each has been tested. > > > > It would be good to have them next to the demos. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > -- > regards, > ==================================================== > GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 > gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
