I was asked to not share the data which was failing (it's part of a "challenge").
-- Raul On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > Dumping out the 3!:3 of the variant operands would be a starting point. > > Henry Rich > > > On 4/20/2013 1:48 PM, Dan Bron wrote: >> >> A few examples, including objectives, expected and observed results, >> along with a description of your operating environment (OS & word size) >> might be a start, even if we can't individually reproduce those results. >> >> Here is a release note from J6.02 which announces (potentially relevant) >> optimizations in this area: >> http://www.jsoftware.com/help/release/underai.htm >> >> >> To determine if this change is responsible for the symptoms, you might try >> some experiments in a pre-J6.02 interpreter. If it is responsible, it's a >> good bet that the optimization is implemented in the &. conjunction, so we >> could start out investigation in the source code of that primitive. >> >> -Dan >> >> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device. >> >> On Apr 20, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have been seeing inconsistent results from the dyad >>> 22 b.&.(a.&i.) >>> >>> I do not have a repeatable test - the variations seem to be path >>> dependent (same data gives different results depending on how the data >>> was generated). However, replacing the above dyad with a more verbose >>> alternative apparently prevented the inconsistencies from occurring. >>> >>> This smells like buggy special code but it might be some external >>> dependence (perhaps an uninitialized value?) >>> >>> Unfortunately, I do not currently have any good ideas for isolating >>> this problem. >>> >>> FYI, >>> >>> -- >>> Raul >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
