=: is just fine the way it is! I just wanted to know why it was the way it was. However, your answer is interesting. Linda
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 'Pascal Jasmin' via Beta Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 10:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Why isn't copula a dyadic verb? you can make =: into one. assign =: 4 : '(x) =: y' 'foo' assign 3 'foo' (] ((4 : 'foo') + +) assign) 4 12 ----- Original Message ----- From: Linda Alvord <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: Thursday, November 6, 2014 12:54 AM Subject: [Jbeta] Why isn't copula a dyadic verb? Both =: and =. seem to have a left and right argument and something happens. The right argument is sent to the left argument. In Appendix E of the Vocabulary, it is called as "Other" Why aren't they both verbs? Linda ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
