This looks like an invalid pointer issue, the _4294967295 should
be returned from a previous ole call.  You should be able to run
J32 on your 64-bit windows 8.1, can you also try that?  Testing
with jconsole only should be sufficient.

Чт, 06 ноя 2014, Mike Day написал(а):
> OK - progress in some ways.  As Bill is running LibreOffice,  I
> downloaded it in place of Open Office, tweaking the default
> program settings to force wdooo calls to invoke its binaries.
> 
> My application still crashes with the new JQT and Jconsole,
> and so does oocalc.ijs.
> 
> HOWEVER,  I've changed oleinvoke from an adverb to a
> verb, together with the verbs that call it.  This is so that
> debug can trace through oleinvoke  (is there a way to trace
> execution through a verb derived on the fly from an adverb?)
> 
> So now, I can report that test'' fails at the following line in oleinvoke:
> (NB. I'm breaking it into three parts, so it should appear as three lines
> here)
> 
> if.
> S_OK~: hr=. disp idInvoke id ; GUID_NULL ; 0 ; m ; (<dispparams) ; (<temp) ;
> 0 ; 0
> do. 13!:8[3 [ oleerrno=: hr
> 
> The rh argument for idInvoke is
> id ; GUID_NULL ; 0 ; m ;(<dispparams) ; (<temp) ; 0 ; 0
> 
> +-----------+----------------+-+-+--------------+--------------+-+-+
> 
> |_4294967295| |0|1|+------------+|+------------+|0|0|
> 
> |           |                | | ||867122743072|||867151675840|| | |
> 
> |           |                | | |+------------+|+------------+| | |
> 
> +-----------+----------------+-+-+--------------+--------------+-+-+
> 
> (though presumably handles are arbitrary)
> 
> Opening the two boxed items makes this easier to read:
> id ; GUID_NULL ; 0 ; m ;dispparams ; temp ; 0 ; 0
> 
> +-----------+----------------+-+-+------------+------------+-+-+
> 
> |_4294967295| |0|1|867122743072|867151675840|0|0|
> 
> +-----------+----------------+-+-+------------+------------+-+-+
> 
> (Apologies if these boxes are poorly aligned!)
> 
> 
> Copying the following from the debug gui and running explicitly
> 
> in the J terminal session
> disp idInvoke id ; GUID_NULL ; 0 ; m ; (<dispparams) ; (<temp) ; 0 ; 0
> leads to the crash.
> 
> 
> idInvoke is a system call:
> '1 6 > i x x *c x s *x *x x x'&(15!:0)@;
> 
> 
> That's all folks!
> 
> 
> Thanks, Mike
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/11/2014 16:09, Mike Day wrote:
> >But how to see them if J crashes first?
> >
> >I could see that S_OK was  zero in olecreate,
> >but debug then only got as far as the first line
> >oleinvoke with no chance of checking the code.
> >
> >Bill was keen to see reports on wdooo behaviour
> >with a variety of Windows o/s and numbers of
> >bits.
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >On 06/11/2014 13:37, bill lam wrote:
> >>When calls in wdooo fail, they should return non-zero error code,that
> >>might
> >>give hints of why it failed.
> >>On Nov 6, 2014 5:05 PM, "Mike Day" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Dear Forum
> >>>
> >>>I've got a problem with J crashing with wdooo, which I've
> >>>been discussing privately with Bill Lam.  Privately because
> >>>my example involved private data.
> >>>
> >>>We seem to have discovered where the trouble lies or at
> >>>least where it starts,  and in a public area, so it can be
> >>>shared.
> >>>
> >>>I tried the verb "test" in ~addons/tables/wdooo/oocalc.ijs.
> >>>Using debug,  I see that it fails at the line
> >>>olemethod__p base ; 'createInstance' ; 'com.sun.star.frame.Desktop'
> >>>(Actually, olemethod attempts to call oleinvoke; the error appears
> >>>to occur with '' (m oleinvoke) y   )
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Executing this line throws an exception under Windows 8.1
> >>>with the message
> >>>     jqt.exe has stopped working  etc
> >>>
> >>>While I'm running Apache Open Office 4.1.1 in Windows 8.1 on a
> >>>64 bit machine,   Bill has libreoffice 4.3.3 in windows xp in
> >>>32 bits,  where oocalc's test works ok,  so we're at an impasse.
> >>>
> >>>Is anyone else who's got an Open Office + 64-bit Windows 8.1
> >>>setup willing to try the oocalc test?
> >>>
> >>>I recall trying out libreoffice two or three years ago and then
> >>>finding Open Office to be more stable - but perhaps things have
> >>>improved.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks in advance,
> >>>
> >>>Mike
> 
> 
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4189/8522 - Release Date: 11/06/14
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --armor --export 4434BAB3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to