In J803, put the cursor next to * (which is the bit you care about) and then Ctrl+F1 or Ctrl+Shift+F1.

Henry Rich

On 11/19/2014 4:12 AM, Linda Alvord wrote:
OK, Maybe something like name <'*y' to get signum.

I find it bothersome to need to go to a brower and vocabulary or wiki if I
could get  the name somehow easily where I am working.

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jan-Pieter Jacobs
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 4:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Names would be Nice

The response is not wasteful.
By default, undefined variables are assumed to be verbs, to allow for
building a verb top down eg:

center =: - mean NB. mean not defined here.
   mean =: +/%#

If you would enter "center" followed by a return, you do want to see the
hook you just created.

The same goes for x and y, which are only considered "special" in explicit
functions.

2014-11-19 9:51 GMT+01:00 Linda Alvord <[email protected]>:

But you only get thie "wastegul" response if you are in a new
environment where x and y are unassigned and you want to know the name of
the verb.

Linda

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Raul Miller
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 3:41 AM
To: Beta forum
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Names would be Nice

If x*y was 'times' what would 2*x*y be? What would (x*y)-1 be?

Also, try this:
    9!:3]4
    x*y

Or, this:
    x=: 2
    y=: 3
    x*y

Or, if that is still a waste, consider the possibility of doing
something which does not involve a computer - maybe that would be less
wasteful?

Thanks,

--
Raul





On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Linda Alvord
<[email protected]>
wrote:

Bill,  Here's what I mean:

Current response in terminal:

    *y
* y
    x*y
x * y

What if the response was:

   *y
Signum

   X*y
times

To me it seem like a wasted response.

Linda



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of bill lam
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 4:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] Names would be Nice

this page may be interesting to you,
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Primitives

the location of the script primitiv.ijs had been moved to addons
since
J7.


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Linda Alvord
<[email protected]>
wrote:
In a term or in jijx, you can get definitions:



    able

1 : (':'; '(((#~LF-.@e.])5!:5<''u'');,.y),.({.;}.)":x,y u/x')~



    toupper

3 : 0

x=. I. 26 > n=. ((97+i.26){a.) i. t=. ,y

($y) $ ((x{n) { (65+i.26){a.) x}t

)



It seems that it might be possible to have theses and all entries
provide the name of the verb. Then you could go to socurces to
find information much more quickly than when you don't know or
remember the
name.



*

*

*.

*.

*:

*:

x*

x *

x*.

x *.

x*:

x *:

;:



Linda;:



------------------------------------------------------------------
---- For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-- For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------
-- For information about J forums see
http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to