Since
   'aa'=: \
It isn't special that it also fails in an ". argument.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, 10:36 PM Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> I thought I'd seen an error defining a verb within a verb when I wrote
> 'turns out it cannot. '
> I am unable to replicate that error.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, 3:29 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Parsing blunder.  Something as simple as
>>
>> 'aa' =: \
>>
>> fails.  Will be fixed in next beta/release.
>>
>> I don't understand 'turns out it cannot'.  Are you reporting an error
>> here?
>>
>> I cannot find a problem with ". on non-noun producing non-empty. Please
>> give a testcase.
>>
>> Henry Rich
>>
>> On 8/16/2016 2:08 PM, Paul Jackson wrote:
>> > Given:
>> >
>> >     def
>> > 2 : 0
>> > (m)=: n : y
>> > 'done'
>> > )
>> >
>> > 'verb'def 3 'y- 10'
>> > done
>> >
>> > 'adv' def 1 'u\ y'
>> > |syntax error
>> > | (m)=:n :y
>> >
>> > 'conj'def 2 '(u y)+ (v y)'
>> > |syntax error
>> > | (m)=:n :y
>> >
>> > I saw this problem when J805 beta first released, but I don't like
>> > reporting something that requires lots of code.  Rewriting it this way
>> made
>> > me wonder if a verb could not create a verb. It turns out it cannot.
>> >
>> > In trying to find a workaround, I also discovered that ". doesn't
>> provide
>> > an empty if the result is not a noun.
>> >
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> --
>
> Paul
> 650-766-1863
>
-- 

Paul
650-766-1863
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to