'a b c' =: i. 3

result could be copied in multi assignment? (so usecount =1 for copy)

(somenoun) =: somevalue

current behaviour.  Can't optimize a reassignment anyway if somenoun is an 
expression.


(+: [ 4!:55@((<'fred')"_)) fred =: 5

annoying for sure, but this would not cause problems:


(4!:55@((<'fred')"_) ] +:) fred =: 5

so side-effect code like this can still be done, and in the first form, it 
would raise an error that helps you fix your code.


----- Original Message -----
From: Henry Rich <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Jbeta] 9!:53 question

Not so fast.  What about

'a b c' =: i. 3
(somenoun) =: somevalue
(+: [ 4!:55@((<'fred')"_)) fred =: 5

In fact, the verb left of the assignment MUST touch the assigning value 
directly.

Henry Rich


On 10/6/2016 4:25 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>> On Oct 6, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On the other hand the sentence
>>>   a =: ('b' ,~ 3 ,~ ]) a=: 3 1 4 1 5 9 2
>> This is not inplaceable because the block has a usecount of 2 after the 
>> assignment
> I don't understand why the usecount has to increase after the assignment.
> I guess it's not related to literal, because the sentence
>     a=:('b',~3,~])a=:i.5
> is not inplaced either.  So the data (0 1 2 3 4) from the executing of i.5, 
> have a usecount of 2 after the assignment.  It is very counterintuitive, 
> because any verb left of the assignment is not able to touch the result of 
> i.5 directly without going through the reference from a.  I guess in 
> principle, after massive amount of change to the reference counting part of 
> the code, we could make it such that the use count is one after assignment of 
> name=:(data without a name) immediately.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to