We do not. The test suite contains some focused tests that developed over the years for specific things.
A good performance test suite would be very nice. A great community collaboration project! An initial focus on avx gives a nice starting point. And the results would definitely drive some future JE development. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Xiao-Yong Jin <[email protected]> wrote: > This is very interesting. Do you guys have a standard set of scripts for > performance testing? > > > On Mar 12, 2017, at 8:28 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Complex +/ . * does not use AVX yet. > > > > Henry Rich > > > > On 3/12/2017 7:47 PM, Don Guinn wrote: > >> Tried a 1000 by 1000 complex matrix and compared inverting it and then > the > >> matrix product of it and its inverse on J805 and J806 avx. Saw less > than a > >> 10% improvement with avx. Then tried a real 5000 by 5000 matrix and saw > a > >> speedup of 1.6 on the inverse and 2.2 on the multiply. Ran it several > times > >> back and forth to minimize outside interference. Probably the complex > >> numbers aren't well vectorized yet. > >> > >> My laptop is kind of old. 8G memory and Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3619QM CPU > @ > >> 2.30GHz running Windows 10. Had upgraded from the original Windows 7 > and it > >> doesn't run really well, but maybe wait a while before getting a new > one to > >> let the latest avx mature some. > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
