I was just noting the problem with getting lapacke running. Are you thinking we could potentially drop the lapacke addon? I don't have any current need for it that isn't satisfied by math/lapack2. Having said that I haven't been using either much lately so it may be worth canvassing wider? From memory there is a potential difference in interface (row major vs column major arrays)?
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM bill lam <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there funcrion in lapacke that is not available in lapack2 ? Is it ok to > use lapack2 only? > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019, 9:43 AM Ric Sherlock <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Some of the addons that require binaries to be downloaded separately have > > very helpful instructions on how to get them. In the case of the > > api/lapacke addon there is something missing... > > > > If I try to load api/lapacke I get a popup dialog box letting me know > that > > the api/lapacke binary has not yet been installed and to run the > following > > command to install it: > > > > getbin_jlapacke_'' > > > > Install math/lapack first. Need jlapack64.dll > > > > > > However in j901 the math/lapack addon is no longer available (having been > > replaced by the math/lapack2 addon. I downloaded the binaries for that > > addon but that still doesn't resolve the error for api/lapacke. > > > > Engine: j901/j64/windows > > > > Beta-g: commercial/2019-05-28T14:37:00 > > > > Library: 9.01.07 > > > > Qt IDE: 1.8.3/5.12.3 > > > > Platform: Win 64 > > > > Installer: J901 install > > > > InstallPath: c:/program files/j901 > > > > Contact: www.jsoftware.com > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
