You can follow the example of tests to use the new lapack addons. There are too many functions in lapack so we can't maintain a comprehensive list of user scripts like dgeev.ijs
The new addon contains protocol of all current lapack functions, while the old addon is limited to those few user scripts such as dgeev.ijs I think manually copy the original lapack addon folder to j901 is ok if you really wanted, but I had never tried. On Sun, Nov 24, 2019, 1:09 AM J. Patrick Harrington <[email protected]> wrote: > Well *that* is not good. > I just tried running my scripts that use, e.g., lapack/dgeev.ijs, > and those things are not found. > > "thin layer but will provide all api." What does that mean? > Can I add files from j64-807 to the j901 addons? > > This is pretty inconvient - why the change? > > Patrick > > On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, bill lam wrote: > > > No. > > > > Lapack2 is intended to be a thin layer but will provide all api. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019, 11:06 PM John Randall <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> In J901, some of the LAPACK files from j807 seem to have disappeared. > >> There are some test files (which work), but the user-level includes like > >> geev.ijs and gesvd.ijs are not present. Are there plans to restore > them? > >> > >> Best wishes, > >> > >> John > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
