I am curious about the scope of names. Is it that a direct definition within an explicit definition does not hide the local names previously defined in the explicit definition except for the names m, n, u, v, x and y? And any local names defined (other m, n, u, v, x and y) in the direct definition exist afterward in the explicit definition?
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:28 PM Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. > > Thank you, > > -- > Raul > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 7:21 PM Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I can give you multiline noun DDs but the contents must follow J word > > formation and fit into the DD syntax. In other words, if {{)n contains > > other {{, they are going to be treated as starting nested DDs. > > > > This will be adequate for the example you gave, and for most uses I > expect. > > > > Henry Rich > > > > On 10/20/2020 5:36 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > > > Nice, thank you. > > > > > > That said.... one line noun DDs by themselves are silly. But they > > > would address an issue with nested quotes -- so they would not be > > > entirely silly. > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > > > > > > > -- > > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > > https://www.avg.com > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
