raspberry pi beta-i binaries were built from the repository head, so that some bugs might already fixed. direct definition for nouns may also implemented, but I haven't tried it yet.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020, 6:53 AM Joey K Tuttle <[email protected]> wrote: > Partly just to see if I could manage this “cross platform” trick - > > JVERSION > Engine: j902/j32/raspberry > Beta-i: commercial/2020-10-22T02:48:16 > Library: 9.02.06 > Platform: Linux 32 > Installer: J902 install > InstallPath: /usr/local/lib/j902 > Contact: www.jsoftware.com > > %3x (] * <.@^) 2x<.@^>:i.3 > 1r18 1r324 1r52488 > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 25, 2020, at 14:39, 'robert therriault' via Beta < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mac I get the expected results > > > > JVERSION > > Engine: j902/j64avx2/darwin > > Beta-i: commercial/2020-10-20T10:35:52 > > Library: 9.02.06 > > Qt IDE: 1.8.7/5.12.7(5.12.7) > > Platform: Darwin 64 > > Installer: J902 install > > InstallPath: /users/bobtherriault/j902 > > Contact: www.jsoftware.com > > %3x (] * <.@^) 2x<.@^>:i.3 > > 1r18 1r324 1r52488 > > > > Cheers, bob > > > >> On Oct 25, 2020, at 14:08, 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> From the iPad again, it comes down to > >> 1 % 2x > >> 1r2 NB. In J901, 8, 7 etc > >> 0 NB. in J902 > >> So does extended%extended give rational or not? > >> Mike > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >>>> On 25 Oct 2020, at 20:58, 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> OK sending with considerable effort from the laptop : > >>> copy & paste from J902 session in JQt under Windows 10: > >>> > >>> JVERSION > >>> Engine: j902/j64/windows > >>> Beta-i: commercial/2020-10-20T10:09:05 > >>> Library: 9.02.06 > >>> Qt IDE: 1.8.7/5.12.7(5.12.7) > >>> Platform: Win 64 > >>> Installer: J902 install > >>> InstallPath: c:/d/j902 > >>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com > >>> %3x (] * <.@^) 2x<.@^>:i.3 > >>> 0 0 0 > >>> > >>> Best wishes > >>> > >>> Mike > >>>> On 25 October 2020 at 20:40 Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I don't get this error. I am running a post-beta-i development > system. > >>>> > >>>> Henry Rich > >>>> > >>>>> On 10/25/2020 4:39 PM, 'Mike Day' via Beta wrote: > >>>>> I should have mentioned that my example works ok in J901 in Windows > as well as J701 on this tablet. > >>>>> Mike > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 25 Oct 2020, at 20:27, Mike Day <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Experimenting with Euler Problem 731, I should get: > >>>>>> %3(] * <.@^)2<.@^>: i.3. NB. 1/(b^(c^k).c^k) in maths notation > >>>>>> 0.0555556 0.00308642 1.9052e_5 > >>>>>> %3x(] * <.@^)2x<.@^>: i.3. NB. Try extended nos > >>>>>> 1r18 1r324 1r52488 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +/\%3x(] * <.@^)2x<.@^>: i.3. NB. Cum sum > >>>>>> 1r18 19r324 3079r52488 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 23j20":,.+/\%3x(] * <.@^)2x<.@^>: i.3. Looking for repeated > pattern .... > >>>>>> 0.05555555555555555556 > >>>>>> 0.05864197530864197531 > >>>>>> 0.05866102728242645938 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Only using k=1,3 here for concise display. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is the sort of thing I see here on the iPad, and also in J901 > >>>>>> However, in J902 beta i, I get (can’t email from Windows just now, > so faking it!): > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +/\%3x(] * <.@^)2x<.@^>: i.3. > >>>>>> 0 0 0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My mistake!? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Mike > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 25 Oct 2020, at 16:42, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Modern J uses a virtual block for the result of (, y), so now > (+/@, y) and (+/ , y) run at the same speed. A different example is needed. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Henry Rich > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 10/25/2020 12:01 PM, Brian Schott wrote: > >>>>>>>> Jan-Pieter, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> First, thanks for pointing out the link. > >>>>>>>> But I am having some problems. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [*******my comment 0) here is likely inappropriate in light of > Henry's > >>>>>>>> reply in this thread > >>>>>>>> 0) Are you suggesting that some wording be added to that link? It > looks to > >>>>>>>> me as if you are but where? > >>>>>>>> I say where because there are at least 3 different concepts > treated on that > >>>>>>>> page: SC, EIP, and AIP. > >>>>>>>> ] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1) I am finding problems on that page that I cannot explain. For > example, > >>>>>>>> a) on one line discussing EIP the following is stated twice, when > it is > >>>>>>>> clear that the two should be different `(V0@[ V1 V2)` . > >>>>>>>> b) [this comment may also be explained by Henry's reply but I > don't see how] > >>>>>>>> I cannot confirm the improvements suggested by the example there. > >>>>>>>> Perhaps using j807 is the problem. See my session below. > >>>>>>>> 9!:52'' > >>>>>>>> 1 > >>>>>>>> a =: 1000 1000 ?@$ 0 NB. it is unfortunate that the > +/ result > >>>>>>>> suggests that a contains integers, not reals > >>>>>>>> +/ , a NB. perhaps 1000 > 1000 > >>>>>>>> could be reduced to 25 25? > >>>>>>>> 499960 > >>>>>>>> +/@, a > >>>>>>>> 499960 > >>>>>>>> ts =: 6!:2 , 7!:2@] > >>>>>>>> ts '+/ , a' NB. notice the small space usage > here > >>>>>>>> 0.001987 1408 > >>>>>>>> ts '+/@, a' NB. the time reduction is so small as > to be > >>>>>>>> "within statistical error" > >>>>>>>> 0.001965 1536 > >>>>>>>> JVERSION > >>>>>>>> Engine: j807/j64/darwin > >>>>>>>> Release-c: commercial/2019-02-24T10:50:40 > >>>>>>>> Library: 8.07.26 > >>>>>>>> Platform: Darwin 64 > >>>>>>>> Installer: J807 install > >>>>>>>> InstallPath: /users/brian/j64-807 > >>>>>>>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 8:42 AM Jan-Pieter Jacobs < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I guess this is worth mentioning here: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/SpecialCombinations#Assignments_In_Place_.28AIP.29 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Assignments are done in place if you use a specific form > recognised by the > >>>>>>>>> interpreter. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you do not assign the result, or use it in a longer sentence, > it will > >>>>>>>>> not be recognised, copying over the entire array, rather than > updating a > >>>>>>>>> single element. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jan-Pieter > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> (B=) > >>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > >>>>>>> https://www.avg.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>>> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
