The introduction of direct definition inspired me to revisit some older code that I had abandoned, but in cleaning up that code, I believe I have run into a name resolution issue which seems to be handled wrong.
To illustrate: example2=:1 :0 expl=. : expl ) 1 example2 3 expl 3 Normally, in J, names which represent verbs may be looked up later, but names which represent nouns, adverbs and conjunctions are looked up immediately. Here, if I use a different definition, we can see that this character holds for nouns example3=:1 :0 expl=. 3 expl ) 1 example3 3 But, honestly, in adverb and conjunction results, I cannot think of any good reason for a locally defined name to not be resolved. (This is not a new issue. It's just something I stumbled over, testing the new features.) Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
