I got the same incorrect result in JVERSION Engine: j903/j64avx2/windows
Beta-j: commercial/2021-05-18T15:03:51 Library: 9.03.04 Qt IDE: 1.9.2/5.12.10(5.12.10) Platform: Win 64 Installer: J903 install InstallPath: c:/j903_win64/j903 Contact: www.jsoftware.com Tried it on older versions and got the correct result. Version 6.02 and 8.07 On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 6:28 AM Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > I can reproduce this issue in J902, j901 gives the correct result. > > +&1^:_2 i.3 > _2 > JVERSION > Engine: j902/j64avx2/darwin > ... > > +&1^:_2 i.3 > _2 _1 0 > JVERSION > Engine: j901/j64avx2/darwin > ... > > FYI, > > -- > Raul > > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:14 AM ethiejiesa via Programming > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 9!:14'' > > j902-b/j64avx2/linux/release/GPL3/ > guix.gnu.org/1970-01-01T00:00:00/clang-9-0-1/SLEEF=1 > > > > +&1^:_1 i.3 > > _1 0 1 > > +&1^:_2 i.3 > > _2 > > $$ +&1^:_2 i.3 > > 0 > > > > Similar results for other negative exponents smaller than _1. > > > > My beta is a bit behind, but I see the same there, while my j901 is > producing > > the expected results. Specific version info below: > > > > j903-h/j64avx2/linux/beta/GPL3/ > guix.gnu.org/1970-01-01T00:00:00/clang-9-0-1/SLEEF=1 > > j901-f/j64avx2/linux/release/GPL3/guix.gnu.org/1970-01-01T00:00:00 > > > > Can anyone reproduce? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
