It's not jtlpca(), but its caller, that needs updating. I'll fix it for
the next beta.
An old copy of J wouldn't help so much, because Roger distinguished
several different classes of atomic representation for modifier trains,
while I have dumped them all into one class.
Henry Rich
On 9/28/2021 4:58 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
Hmm... indeed
9!:3]5 6
@ @ (+@+)
@ @ +@+
@ @ (+@+)
@ @ +@+
(@ @ +) @ +
(@ @ +) @ +
Presumably jtlcpa in rl.c needs to be updated (or perhaps recovered
from a very old copy of J)??
https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/blob/master/jsrc/rl.c#L38
--
Raul
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:34 AM Elijah Stone <[email protected]> wrote:
@ @ (+@+)
@ @ +@+
But @ @ +@+ is not the same as @ @ (+@+).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
